Perhaps the most prominent of those features that we previously knew about Rocket Lake processors is that they will finally support the fourth generation of PCI Express 4.0 lines, as Intel is about two years behind AMD in supporting it, although the Z490 chip that came with the tenth generation processors last year It was already PCI 4.0 ready but all PCI Express and M.2 slots on these boards only ran at PCI Express 3.0 speeds.
This is because the tenth generation of Comet Lake-S CPU’s was not doing that, so we asked ourselves .. Why should I buy a new chip and a new processor while I know in advance that after a few months, a newer chip will come and will support more features?
The comment wars between Intel and AMD fans have been hot for the last few release cycles, with a lot of digital ink spilled about which company has?or has not?improved significantly over the years. There’s been no shortage of opinions about the current raw performance of each company’s fastest processors, either. We thought it would be interesting to dive into archived performance benchmarks of the fastest desktop/enthusiast CPU’s for each company to get a good overview of how each has really done over the years?and perhaps to even see if there are patterns to be gleaned or to make some bets about the future.
Before we dive into charts, let’s start out with some tables?that way, you can see which CPU’s we’re using as milestones for each year. While we’re at it, there are a couple of irregularities in the data; we’ll discuss those also and talk about the things that a simple chart won’t show you.
Twenty years of enthusiast computing
|Year||Intel Model||AMD Model||Notes|
|2001||Pentium 4 2.0GHz (1c/1t)||Athlon XP 1900+ (1c/1t)|
|2002||Pentium 4 2.8GHz (1c/2t)||Athlon XP 2800+ (1c/1t)||Intel introduces hyper threading|
|2003||Pentium 4 Extreme 3.2GHz (1c/2t)||Athlon XP 3200+ (1c/1t)|
|2004||Pentium 4 3.4GHz (1c/2t)||Athlon 64 FX-55 (1c/1t)|
|2005||Pentium 4 3.8GHz (1c/2t)||Athlon 64 X2 4800+ (2c/2t)|
|2006||Pentium Extreme 965 (2c/4t)||Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (2c/2t)||Intel takes the undisputed performance lead here?and keeps it for a decade straight.|
|2007||Core 2 Extreme QX6800 (4c/4t)||Phenom X4 9600 (4c/4t)||Intel and AMD both launch the first true quad-core desktop CPU’s|
|2008||Core 2 Extreme X9650 (4c/4t)||Phenom X4 9950 (4c/4t)|
|2009||Core i7-960 (4c/8t)||Phenom II X4 965 (4c/4t)|
|2010||Core i7-980X (6c/12t)||Phenom II X6 1100T (6c/6t)||Intel and AMD both introduce hex-core desktop CPU’s|
|2011||Core i7-990X (6c/12t)||FX-8150 (8c/8t)|
|2012||Core i7-3770K (4c/8t)||FX-8350 (8c/8t)||Intel abandons hex-core desktop CPU’s?but few miss them, due to large single-threaded gains|
|2013||Core i7-4770K (4c/8t)||FX-9590 (8c/8t)||AMD’s underwhelming FX-9590 launches?and it’s Team Red’s last enthusiast CPU for four long years|
|2014||Core i7-4790K (4c/8t)||FX-9590 (8c/8t)||Intel’s 5th generation Core dies stillborn. AMD releases low-power APUs, but no successor to FX-9590|
|2015||Core i7-6700K (4c/8t)||FX-9590 (8c/8t)|
|2016||Core i7-7700K (4c/8t)||FX-9590 (8c/8t)||Strictly speaking, 2016 was an Intel whiff?Kaby Lake didn’t actually launch until January 2017|
|2017||Core i7-8700K (6c/12t)||Ry zen 7 1800X (8c/16t)||Launch of AMD’s Zen architecture, return of the Intel hex-core desktop CPU|
|2018||Core i9-9900K (8c/16t)||Ry zen 7 2700X (8c/16t)|
|2019||Core i9-9900KS (8c/16t)||Ry zen 9 3950X (16c/32t)||AMD’s Zen 2 architecture launches, Intel whiffs hard in the performance segment|
|2020||Core i9-10900K (10c/20t)||Ry zen 9 5950X (16c/32t)||AMD’s Zen 3 finally crushes Intel’s long-held single-threaded performance record|
Although both Intel and AMD: Obviously launch a wide array of processors for different price points and target markets each year, we’re limiting ourselves to the fastest desktop or “enthusiast” processor from each year. That means no server processors and no High-End Desktop (HEDT) processors either?so we won’t be looking at either Thread rippers or the late model XE series Intel parts.
Even for someone like myself: Who lived through this entire period as a system builder, it’s a giant pain in the butt assembling a list like this?let alone matching test results. It’s especially difficult on the AMD side, where there’s no real equivalent to Intel’s Ark?providing a single list of processors, sort able by generation, type, and launch date. If you think I picked the wrong “top processor” for a year, let me know in the comments.
We should address a couple of anomalies: In the charts right off the top?first of all, no, the absence of a new AMD performance CPU in 2014, 2015, and 2016 is not an oversight. 2013’s FX-9590?widely (and deservedly) panned for its monstrous-for-the-time 225W TDP and unimpressive performance?was Team Red’s fastest CPU for four years running. During that time, AMD launched several generations of low-power, inexpensive desktop APUs?none of which outperformed the FX-9590.
Intel also had a couple of stumbles: During 2013-2017, though none so serious or for so long. The fifth-generation Core series was basically stillborn in 2014, although a refresh of the fourth-generation Core i7 series did provide a significant performance boost. Two years later was technically another whiff?Kaby Lake, with the Core i7-7700K, didn’t actually launch until January 2017. We fudged a little and allowed Kaby Lake in 2016’s row, because otherwise it would disappear entirely?Coffee Lake, and the i7-8700K, appeared later the same year.